No, there's no reason not to use fprintf
This commit is contained in:
parent
f004771cf2
commit
3a78485f2d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -398,16 +398,9 @@ SDL_LogOutput(void *userdata, int category, SDL_LogPriority priority,
|
|||
}
|
||||
#elif defined(__PSP__)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int length;
|
||||
char* output;
|
||||
FILE* pFile;
|
||||
/* !!! FIXME: is there any reason we didn't just use fprintf() here? */
|
||||
length = SDL_strlen(SDL_priority_prefixes[priority]) + 2 + SDL_strlen(message) + 2;
|
||||
output = SDL_stack_alloc(char, length);
|
||||
SDL_snprintf(output, length, "%s: %s\n", SDL_priority_prefixes[priority], message);
|
||||
pFile = fopen ("SDL_Log.txt", "a");
|
||||
fwrite (output, strlen (output), 1, pFile);
|
||||
SDL_stack_free(output);
|
||||
fprintf(pFile, "%s: %s\n", SDL_priority_prefixes[priority], message);
|
||||
fclose (pFile);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue