Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 03:15:01 +0100

From: David Symmonds
Subject: SDL Typedef Structs

Hi, Thanks for the SDL libraries, I have been using them for about a year
now and they are really brilliant. One thing that I have just found whilst
using them through C++ (and needing forward declarations) is that when you
typedef structs you sometimes use

typedef struct Name
{
...
}Name;

e.g. SDL_Surface


and other times use

typedef struct
{
...
}Name;


e.g. SDL_Rect

The first type works fine, when I define a header file I can just put
'struct Name;' at the top and use the Name throughout. However, the second
type is harder to use in a header, and I haven't found a way yet, other than
to include 'SDL.h' in the header file (undesirable). Would there be any harm
in changing the definition of SDL_Rect and such like to the second form?

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40912

include/SDL_cdrom.h

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef enum {
 /* Given a status, returns true if there's a disk in the drive */
 #define CD_INDRIVE(status)	((int)status > 0)
 
-typedef struct {
+typedef struct SDL_CDtrack {
 	Uint8 id;		/* Track number */
 	Uint8 type;		/* Data or audio track */
 	Uint16 unused;