Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:20:25 +0200
From: Joost Baas Subject: why call arts artsc? I, and a few other people at the mplayer-docs-mailinglist were wondering why you decided to call arts artsc. I understand usually users have nothing to do with libsdl, just developers, but because you can choose the audio-driver being used by mplayer, one of which is sdl, and you can also choose the sdl subdriver, it is necessary to have a well-known or logical name. artsc is not the logical choice, and it's very hard to look up the right name if you don't know what you're looking for. --HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Ac70aab31-4412-0410-b14c-859654838e24/trunk%40957
This commit is contained in:
parent
c52f363aaa
commit
48329dae36
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static char rcsid =
|
|||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* The tag name used by artsc audio */
|
||||
#define ARTSC_DRIVER_NAME "artsc"
|
||||
#define ARTSC_DRIVER_NAME "arts"
|
||||
|
||||
/* Audio driver functions */
|
||||
static int ARTSC_OpenAudio(_THIS, SDL_AudioSpec *spec);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue